There are several solutions that I know:
I am preferring the first one right now to avoid any “magic” & dependency on the huge “active_support” (while writing gems).
If I ever got the problem that: when A requiring B, it should also require C before B, I would have:
- D wrapping B
- D has
class_eval
to include C then B - A will require D instead of B
I haven’t had time to read the source of the 3rd solution, saw it on RubyFlow or RubyWeekly.
What do you use? Do you have other solutions missing here?